Thursday, September 6, 2007

Adaptive Argumentation

I approach an argument assuming that I am correct, but never assuming that I must be correct. This allows me to employ a consensual style of argument that appeals to audience, that is, if at first I seem unconfident my primary target can then be eased into an argument comfortably. Then, when they don’t expect it, I can unleash my weaponry. However, instead of a never-ending onslaught of evidence and points, I push the issue subtly, sometimes without the recipient even knowing.

Sometimes using sarcasm or humor to woo someone, I present my facts quickly and try to become acclimated with whom I am speaking through the use of observational skills and keen interest into what they may be arguing in return. I believe half of this tactic comes from my mother who always taught me to think abstractly and “out of the box” but still to-the-point enough so that it is understandable. My father, on the other hand, is a very loquacious and amiable man, and he lent me knowledge in that “you can learn more from how someone looks at you, than from what they say to you.”

According to the checklist on page 21 of the Essentials of Argument, I place more as a consensual arguer yet still favor an individual’s opinion and favor abstract thinking and reasoning. This means that I tend to a group of people individually, personally. Then I give them what I know, make logical connections, and break down the issue clearly.

Since I never assume that I must be correct, if someone points out a fallacy in my thinking or reasoning that might change my mind, I will weigh my points to theirs and if mine are false, I am quick to switch sides. Adaptability is the most important characteristic, in my opinion, of argument. Knowing when I am wrong and understanding why is what will lead me closer to the truth, in the end. Knowing when my argument is failing to persuade somebody allows me to adapt and switch my technique mid-argument in order to achieve the desired outcome.

I like to think my methodology is sound, but if it is not, I am quick to change it so that it may be.

1 comment:

molly said...

Your first sentence really caught my attention. This seems to be a good approach to an argument. Also, the strategy you use to "reel in" your audience is a good tactic. This is a very well written paper, and you express yourself well.